In the two speeches provided, This
Is Water and The Nobel Lecture, there are both similarities and differences.
Even though they are years apart they share the same concept, but also have a different standpoint. The speech given at the high school commencement, This Is Water, by
David Foster Wallace starts off by explaining how easy it is to go along with
our so called “default setting”. It makes our lives less challenging to worry
only about ourselves. Later on in this reading he points out how “pissed and
miserable” he is every time he thinks to himself that people are always in his way. To my understanding he then
intends to explain how beneficial it is to develop a conscious mind, to consider
what other people around him are going through. In The Nobel Lecture, Toni
Morrison believes that it also destroys not to have some sort of innocent
language. “Sexist language, racist language, theistic language… cannot, do not permit
new knowledge or encourage the mutual exchange of ideas.” She backs this up
with the misfortune of the collapse of the Tower of Babel, where she reiterates
that if only the architectures took the time to understand other languages and
have other opinions they could have constructed it without any problems.
As mentioned earlier, Wallace talks
about our “default setting”, something we were born with. He thinks that our
gathered thoughts about ourselves are based on how we believe that we’re the
center of the world. Whereas in The Nobel Lecture, Morrison goes on about how
culture can cultivate the way we use language. While Wallace stresses about it
should be in our nature to consider language, Morrison trusts that we develop
this concept: language.
No comments:
Post a Comment