Compare and Contrast
Nobel Lecture by, Toni Morrison
and This is water by David Foster
Wallace are two passionate essays written by two different authors who shared
the same idea. Being educated is worth more than knowing things. In the Nobel Lecture we are presented to
the idea of Language and how it can often be used as oppressive. He presents
this idea in form of a tale of a woman who is blind and is mocked by her
disability. In the essay This is water,
Wallace often states the proposition of giving people the benefit of the doubt
and how we really never know what is occurring in their lives, but when
Morrison gives us this example of this blind woman we are able to notice that
if we were to expose our vulnerabilities and disabilities there would be people
who would use oppressive language towards us, which at a point does more than
just express violence “it limits knowledge” (Morrison 2). Isolation is also
represented throughout the essays and how we refuse to acknowledge and learn
from the wisdom of others because we think that we are the “absolute center of
the universe, the realest, most vivid person in existence” (Wallace 2). While
Morrison’s essay is more oriented towards racial issues it also involves the
language in which she demonstrates her concern. On the other hand, Wallace’s
speech involves having empathy and the ability to choose how to perceive
others.
I totally agree with your statement between the two authors sharing their own viewpoints. It shows how society isn't being aware of their peers. These two authors allow the audience to recognize that not only are you supposed to be thoughtful human being, but at the same time you have to put yourself in another person shoes to see what they are going through in their personal life. Not everyone is born the same way and have the same abilities as others are. That's why these two stories have so much value.
ReplyDelete